Submitted by WhitesCreek on July 2, 2009 - 11:15am.
Here's my problem with the bill. It caters to the bad guys instead of doing what it's supposed to, which is to try and save what's left of our planet:
...the bill is so corrupted by polluting special interests, including Shell Oil and coal hog Duke Energy -- as well as corporate agribusiness and Wall Street -- that we can't celebrate. Instead of bringing about the transition to clean energy President Obama spoke of during his campaign, this bill is actually counterproductive, gutting the EPA's authority to fight global warming.
Something bad for everyone.... Congress hits a new low with this one and it can't be blamed on the House minority.... At best we are seeing bipartisan corruption.
The stimulus bill was the legislative equivalent of the famous cantina scene from Star Wars, an eye-popping collection of the freakish and exotic, gathered for dubious purposes. The Waxman-Markey cap-and-trade bill, known as ACES (the American Clean Energy and Security Act), is more like the third panel in Hieronymus Bosch’s Garden of Earthly Delights — a hellscape that disturbs the sleep of anybody who contemplates it carefully.
Two main things to understand about Waxman-Markey: First, it will not reduce greenhouse-gas emissions, at least not at any point in the near future. The inclusion of carbon offsets, which can be manufactured out of thin air and political imagination, will eliminate most of the demands that the legislation puts on industry, though in doing so it will manage to drive up the prices consumers pay for every product that requires energy for its manufacture — which is to say, for everything.
Second, it represents a worse abuse of the public trust and purse than the stimulus and the bailouts put together. Waxman-Markey creates a permanent new regime in which environmental romanticism and corporate welfare are mixed together to form political poison. From comic bureaucratic power grabs (check out the section of the bill on candelabras) to the creation of new welfare programs for Democratic constituencies to, above all, massive giveaways for every financial, industrial, and political lobby imaginable, this bill would permanently deform American politics and economic life. [Stephen Spruiell & Kevin Williamson]
WC, did you read the link to the article in the National Review - it said much of what your unreferenced quote said - the bill stinks with corporate well fare and is a pork trough for FOCs (Friends of Congressmen).
OK WC, I dislike the Cap N Trade for my reasons and you dislike it for yours...but alas, can there be no common ground between the left and right - not even in despising this bill?
PS: I agree that since Bill Buckley Jr's death the NR hasn't been up to snuff - goodness his son Christopher even endorsed Obama for President! (the Obama team enjoyed and crowed loudly about Christopher's support BECAUSE he was a conservative agreeing with a Liberal – imagine that).
Here's my problem with the bill. It caters to the bad guys instead of doing what it's supposed to, which is to try and save what's left of our planet:
Something bad for everyone.... Congress hits a new low with this one and it can't be blamed on the House minority.... At best we are seeing bipartisan corruption.
50 Reason Why the Cap N Trade Bill Must Die
Read A Garden of Piggish Delights Link...
A link to the National Review is like a link to nowhere, Brant. Believe what you want to but save me from nonsense.
WC, did you read the link to the article in the National Review - it said much of what your unreferenced quote said - the bill stinks with corporate well fare and is a pork trough for FOCs (Friends of Congressmen).
OK WC, I dislike the Cap N Trade for my reasons and you dislike it for yours...but alas, can there be no common ground between the left and right - not even in despising this bill?
PS: I agree that since Bill Buckley Jr's death the NR hasn't been up to snuff - goodness his son Christopher even endorsed Obama for President! (the Obama team enjoyed and crowed loudly about Christopher's support BECAUSE he was a conservative agreeing with a Liberal – imagine that).