Mon
Mar 3 2008
01:57 pm
By: Chris Lugo for ...

The right to vote is a fundamental right which belongs to all Americans. Unfortunately the justice system has made it very difficult for some five million Americans who are no longer incarcerated but have previous felony convictions to exercise that right. This is an unreasonable limitation on the rights of those who have served their time and has an enormous impact on the national dialogue, limiting the rights of potential voters and skewing the results of elections.

One example of the impact of felony disenfranchisement is Florida in the 2000 elections. In addition to the thousands of voters who were illegally purged from the rolls, the butterfly ballots and general shenanigans involving the recount, thousands of potential voters were simply not allowed to vote because they had prior felony convictions. If there was ever a historical example of where voting matters, the presidential elections in Flordia between Bush and Gore in 2000 are the example.

The issue of felony disenfranchisement is only one part of a corrupt system that is in vital need of overhaul and reform. According to James Austin, the president of the JFA institute and co-author of the report Unlocking America: Why and How to Reduce America's Prison Population, the criminal justice system is in need of "wholesale reform." Austin says that our resources are misspent, our punishments are too severe, and our sentences are too long. He says that the United States is "clearly overusing" the prison system and not using more beneficial alternative forms of correction.

On February 29th the Pew Center released a new report which estimates that one out of every one hundred Americans is currently incarcerated, and that this is the highest rate of incarceration in US history. The report went on to show that five states pay as much or more on jails as they do on schools.

Clearly our priorities are misguided and it is time to change things regarding how we deal with the issue of corrections. Fundamental to restoring civility and dignity to the national dialgoue is restoring the right to vote for convicted felons. These men and women have served their time and paid the price that society requires for their infractions, and it is time to give them a second chance.

Limiting the right to vote only further punishes men and women who are working hard to become members of society in good standing, it affects the outcome of national and local elections and is an undue burden on the poor and minorities. It also has a deeper cost that cannot be measured. Restoring the right to vote doesn't just affect our basic democratic expression, it also has profound affects on that individual's sense of self and their sense of identity. It impacts on the sense of fairness and justice of the entire society. Common sense and morality calls us to address this injustice.

Chris Lugo for US Senate
9 Music Sq So #164
Nashville, TN 37203
615-593-0304
chris4senate@gmail.com
(link...)

Reply

Mark,

Thanks for writing. These sites were both recommended to me by a supporter as places I might want to check into and submit my positions on various issues. I am a candidate for federal office and people have a right to know what I think. I am also interested in what other people think and I have been reading the replies to my post. Just because I don't respond to every thread doesn't mean that I am not reading them. But thanks for asking.

Sincerely,

chris Lugo
Candidate for US Senate
Tennessee

Welcome, Chris

We appreciate your thoughts and ideas, and look forward to seeing how the primary race works out now that there are three candidates running.

Good Luck,

WhitesCreek

PS: I've been adding the break when I see your posts so that they don't take up the entire front page. We ask folks to hold the teasers to 10 lines or so. The break icon is that A above the dotted line with a B below.

Right to Vote

Where in the US Constitution does it state the "right to vote"? The right to vote is not a fundamental right in our Constitution.

Personally, I believe their should be an IQ test given to validate your privlage to vote.

I am sorry....my error. In the Original Preamble of the Bill of Rights there was NOT a right vote. It was ratified MUCH later. AMENDMENT XXIV
Passed by Congress August 27, 1962. Ratified January 23, 1964.

Amendment XXIV: Taxes and the right to vote.

I believe their should be an IQ test

I favor a critical thinking test with a thorough knowlege of each candidate's voting history and positions.

Amendment XXIV: Taxes and the right to vote.

Section 1

The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.

Don't Forget the State Constitutions

The federal constitution in large part leaves the manner of electing federal officers to the states. See U.S. Constitution, Article 1, Section 4; Article 2, Section 1.

Therefore, you have to also look at the state constitution before you declare that there is no constitutional right to vote.

The Tennessee Constitution, at Article I, Section 5, provides that "elections shall be free and equal, and the right of suffrage... shall never be denied to any person ... except upon conviction by a jury of some infamous crime...." The right to vote is also granted in Tennessee Constitution Article IV, Section 1.

So Brawny is right to the limited extent that there is no constitutional right of felons to vote. But voting is certainly both a fundamental and constitutional right for the rest of us.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Eco Warriors and Politics

Science and Stuff

Lost Medicaid Funding

To date, the failure to expand Medicaid / TennCare has cost the State of Tennessee ? in lost federal funding.