Why Isn't the RCN Headline "Assessor's Office Uses Legal Tactic To Block Property Owner's Hearing"?

Submitted by WhitesCreek on March 12, 2013 - 8:38am.

I wonder if it's too much to ask that we get less "He said, she said" reporting from the Roane County News and more substance. The whole story would be nice.

The RCN ran a story on developer Matt Caldwell having his property valuation hearing continued because he owes back property taxes. Link...

Left out of this reporting is the fact that there are over a hundred agreed orders for reduced valuations that are being held up by the Assessor's office. It is hard to see how a campaign pledge for "Fair Appraisals" is fulfilled by using a legal procedure to block a landowner from getting his day in court in order to get "fair appraisals" because he hasn't paid his taxes which are based on the unfairly high appraisals from the previous assessor's administration. The Judge apparently agrees because he held the assessor's motion to dismiss in abeyance. This legal tactic is a recipe for property owner abuse by the County.

What if an assessor puts an outrageously high and unfair valuation on a property which results in a tax bill that the owner cannot pay? This legal maneuver blocks the property owner from having their day in court, as in this case. Does this sound fair?

Weren't we promised "Fair"?

There's another part of this fiasco that involves the County Commission's push for unjustifiably high valuations so that they can look like they aren't actually raising property taxes when they set the rate. We've mentioned in the past that we estimate an unfair tax burden of $15 million per year on properties that have been devalued by the TVA ash disaster and the subsequent recession but not reflected on the most recent tax reappraisals. All of this is a way to confuse Roane County tax payers and bury the fiscal mismanagement of our recent past. It's time to get it out n the open, get correct valuations on the books and let the chips fall where they may.

Selective reporting isn't helping.


I won't say "I told you so"...

... But I kinda remember mentioning this reporter's agenda-driven methods before. It depends on who or what is his target du jour. Look for a piece soon on some "serious" WAY AFTER THE FACT "investigation" of the remodeling done in the County Exec's office way back when MIKE FARMER went into office. He is working to find all the extravagances the county went to when Farmer went in, even though all the county bought and paid for was flooring to replace a rotting and water damaged carpet and new paint on the walls. The furniture and decorations the intrepid reporter are after were all personally bought and paid for by Farmer, and left the office when he did. But, he's pissed at Farmer right now. Alas, I digress...

If and when the chips fall where they may, all it's gonna mean is the county needs X amount of dollars to operate on, whether they get it by a "real" tax increase or by what you probably would call inflated property values. It costs what it costs... And paying for it is what will happen, unless people want to see some significantly reduced services.

RB

romanstone's picture
I agree - things need to be

I agree - things need to be right, then let the chips fall where they may.

As far as the RCNs, I haven't bought a copy in months. My life has not been affected, excepted maybe positively by not getting frustrated because of their poor reporting on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays.

onetahiti's picture
Stinky ink

We stopped buying RCN when they switched to stinky ink that made me sick when I got within several feet of the paper. After a while we tired of my mother reading the paper to me from across the room. :(

-- OneTahiti

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.